J
jodd
Gast
Bitteschön:
![](/forum/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fabload.de%2Fthumb%2Fpingugk96.png&hash=db19f11ec0eb4a1db18c4ead2dacca42)
oder noch mal anders:
PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.264 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.175 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.169 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.171 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.156 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.171 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.169 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.163 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.167 ms
--- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics ---
9 packets transmitted, 9 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 0.156/0.178/0.264 ms
Per Kabel sieht es so aus:
PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.256 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.157 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.165 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.162 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.151 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.158 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.154 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.167 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.155 ms
--- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics ---
9 packets transmitted, 9 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 0.151/0.169/0.256 ms
Also keinerlei Unterschied.
![](/forum/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fabload.de%2Fthumb%2Fpingugk96.png&hash=db19f11ec0eb4a1db18c4ead2dacca42)
oder noch mal anders:
PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.264 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.175 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.169 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.171 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.156 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.171 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.169 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.163 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.167 ms
--- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics ---
9 packets transmitted, 9 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 0.156/0.178/0.264 ms
Per Kabel sieht es so aus:
PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.256 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.157 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.165 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.162 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.151 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.158 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.154 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.167 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.155 ms
--- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics ---
9 packets transmitted, 9 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 0.151/0.169/0.256 ms
Also keinerlei Unterschied.
Zuletzt bearbeitet von einem Moderator: