@ immortous
... " nichts anderes kennen " - ach hör auf ... - du kennst kein 640 x 480 , oder 800 x 600 , oder 1024 x 768 , oder zu Amiga Zeiten - daddeln am Fernseher . Hat auch Spass gemacht ... , das Game muss nur was taugen ...
aber wenn du mir nicht glaubst , hier
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/dell-se2717h-27-inch-ips-freesync-gaming-monitor,4859-6.html
hol dir nen vernüftiges Full HD Display , haste mehr von als mit nem miesen WQHD oder UHD ...
After reading our comments on the benchmark results, it’s clear
that we’re fans of the SE2717H. For around $200 (at this writing) you get a quality IPS panel with FreeSync and excellent out-of-box color accuracy. Gamma is especially tight and rivals most of the displays in our review database. Contrast is about average, but the perception of depth is heightened thanks to extremely accurate gamma tracking. And color is equally exemplary. Aside from a minor under-saturation in the blue primary, our gamut and luminance tests show results that are nearly all on target. While you can wring every last drop of performance from the SE2717H with a calibration, it’s really not necessary. We think it looks great as is.
There will be concerns from some potential buyers about its FHD resolution and fairly small FreeSync operational window. Our gaming tests showed neither to be an issue.
We’ve said time and time again that resolution does not matter nearly as much as motion quality, contrast, and color accuracy. When the gaming planets are aligned, the extra pixel density provided by a QHD or UHD screen just
doesn’t have much additional impact.
Kurz gesagt , hohe Auflösung ist nicht alles - stimmt generell die Bildqualität haben die zusätzlichen Pixel von WQHD und UHD kaum noch zusätzlichen Einfluss
und du kennst den Dell 2717 halt nicht ... , ist genauso wahr wie deine Aussage ...
Wer s unbedingt meint zu brauchen ... und Geld dafür rauswerfen will ... , genauso wie für ne 1080 TI - bitte schön ....