Du verwendest einen veralteten Browser. Es ist möglich, dass diese oder andere Websites nicht korrekt angezeigt werden.
Du solltest ein Upgrade durchführen oder einen alternativen Browser verwenden.
Du solltest ein Upgrade durchführen oder einen alternativen Browser verwenden.
Sammelthread Big Navi RX 6700XT/6800(XT)/6900XT Overclocking/Undervolting
- Ersteller Facy
- Erstellt am
GerryB
Commodore
- Registriert
- Sep. 2016
- Beiträge
- 4.451
With your very high Watt probably not!
with 230W may be the 718mV and the aging value can make a difference
but care about MPT-Volt to MCT-Volt, may be then not 100mV difference but only 97... 94mV stable
btw.
I looked at the HoF, to find a other User with my 24/7-Score, to compare FT2 vs FT1: 2148MHz vs 2150MHz
see attachment, ... he needs100MHz more avg. gpu clock, to achieve small 57points more= not efficient
with 230W may be the 718mV and the aging value can make a difference
but care about MPT-Volt to MCT-Volt, may be then not 100mV difference but only 97... 94mV stable
btw.
I looked at the HoF, to find a other User with my 24/7-Score, to compare FT2 vs FT1: 2148MHz vs 2150MHz
see attachment, ... he needs100MHz more avg. gpu clock, to achieve small 57points more= not efficient
Anhänge
Zuletzt bearbeitet:
Evgasüchtiger
Commander
- Registriert
- Apr. 2009
- Beiträge
- 2.115
That it's not stable 😁
GerryB
Commodore
- Registriert
- Sep. 2016
- Beiträge
- 4.451
@cra3kheadGerryB schrieb:with 230W may be ...
probably a other way is also possible, ... set a little change with 25MHz in LD2+3+4 ... 2500-->2525MHz
and then try to optimize the Sweetspot around 2523MHz, ... works in this way, 2200-->2223MHz@my 6800nonXT
but
the other change in the tolerance as second step, may be not soo stable
With your high temps I would take only such a lower maxClock!
Anhänge
Zuletzt bearbeitet:
Would you be able to help me do this for 2565Mhz? I know 1050mv at 2565Mhz is damn near 100% stable on my card at the moment.GerryB schrieb:set a little change with 25MHz in LD2+3+4 ... 2500-->2525MHz
and then try to optimize the Sweetspot around 2523MHz
GerryB
Commodore
- Registriert
- Sep. 2016
- Beiträge
- 4.451
It´s not important to stay at 1050mV in MPT because 1056mV is also lower then 1050mV effectiv.cra3khead schrieb:Would you be able to help me do this for 2565Mhz? I know 1050mv at 2565Mhz is damn near 100% stable on my card at the moment.
try 1056 with 2563MHz, ... may be 1056 is enough to reach more maxClock@MCT = 2568...2573MHz
(with 265W? only at some scenes of the TS the eff. maxClock >2500MHz, ...
with maxClock 2573 may be useful to change LD4 2500-->2525MHz as described #6.645)
() that would be a nice/cool goal, also 24/7 useful
I think for example, that the 6950 use the higher per part curves only if the effectiv Volt >1050.
at eff. <1050mV there are lower curves (more effizient?)
edit:
In the same manner I changed my MPT 881mV to 893mV to have fun in Nomad Light@DX12.
thats perfect with low Watts to have a great Boost, ... see attachment1
Nomad also likes a little bit FT2, compared with a other User@FT1, ... see attachment2
in real games I use only maxClock 2248
Anhänge
Zuletzt bearbeitet:
Evgasüchtiger
Commander
- Registriert
- Apr. 2009
- Beiträge
- 2.115
hier mal 45 min GTA5
Anhänge
Would that also be applicable if the max clock is 2568Mhz? I'm not sure if I can reach that high of a clock of 2573Mhz with 1056mv, as when I tried 2580Mhz at 1062mv; it wasn't stable. 1050mv at 2565Mhz I know for sure that it is stable at those settings. I still want to try those optimized curve settings though. Is it universally applicable to any settings or simply to the effective clock being <2500Mhz?GerryB schrieb:with maxClock 2573 may be useful to change LD4 2500-->2525MHz as described #6.645)
GerryB
Commodore
- Registriert
- Sep. 2016
- Beiträge
- 4.451
1050-->1056=6mV more should be enough to try 10MHz +, ... 2563+10=2573cra3khead schrieb:Would that also be applicable if the max clock is 2568Mhz? I'm not sure if I can reach that high of a clock of 2573Mhz with 1056mv, as when I tried 2580Mhz at 1062mv; it wasn't stable. 1050mv at 2565Mhz I know for sure that it is stable at those settings.
if not stable
2568 is enough with 265 watt
every chip is a little bit LOTTERIEcra3khead schrieb:I still want to try those optimized curve settings though. Is it universally applicable to any settings or simply to the effective clock being <2500Mhz?
my chip allows@LD4= 2,200GHz-->2,225GHz
may be your chip can do also this 25MHz (2,500-->2525)
(the reference settings should be with a little safety buffer)
Unfortunately, my card doesn't respond well to the optimized curve settings at all; it just keeps crashing no matter what voltage-fmax settings I useGerryB schrieb:may be your chip can do also this 25MHz (2,500-->2525)
(the reference settings should be with a little safety buffer)
GerryB
Commodore
- Registriert
- Sep. 2016
- Beiträge
- 4.451
may be, LD3 must stay safe at default 2,300GHzcra3khead schrieb:Unfortunately, my card doesn't respond well to ...
sometimes it´s helpfully to know at which Clock the crash happens
not every crash is at the highest boostclock
Yeah I think that was the issue.GerryB schrieb:may be, LD3 must stay safe at default 2,300GHz
Although my score is 30 points lower than it was previously; but I don't know if it has to do with the weather since it's over 100 degrees today.
GerryB
Commodore
- Registriert
- Sep. 2016
- Beiträge
- 4.451
looks good, the clock dip is not soo sharp
just for fun
try a little bit less max clock:
2563 and 2558 with MCT 956...957mV
sometimes the avg. clock is then smoother
and may be <eff.2500MHz a little bit better in the efficiency
and
buy a cheap full version
without demo the temps are lower
just for fun
try a little bit less max clock:
2563 and 2558 with MCT 956...957mV
sometimes the avg. clock is then smoother
and may be <eff.2500MHz a little bit better in the efficiency
and
buy a cheap full version
without demo the temps are lower
Zuletzt bearbeitet:
What clock speed would LD5 control? I prefer it the way you set it up initially with 2573 because in game I can clock anywhere between 2517 and 2530MHz, whereas previously, without the optimized curve, it was a static 2500. I wonder if a curve optimization would be possible to have my 1093mv–2625MHz profile, boost from 2560 to 2580MHz.GerryB schrieb:just for fun
try a little bit less max clock:
2563 and 2558 with MCT 956...957mV
sometimes the avg. clock is then smoother
and may be <eff.2500MHz a little bit better in the efficiency
GerryB
Commodore
- Registriert
- Sep. 2016
- Beiträge
- 4.451
don´t change LD5
may be required@default 3100MHz if the driver crashs
btw.
If maxClock 2553 runs with MPT 1043mV MCT 944mV, that´s would be nicer.
I think, to get 22,3k Score you need more efficiency, means higher avg.clock.
may be required@default 3100MHz if the driver crashs
btw.
If maxClock 2553 runs with MPT 1043mV MCT 944mV, that´s would be nicer.
I think, to get 22,3k Score you need more efficiency, means higher avg.clock.
Zuletzt bearbeitet:
So does the LD4 trick only work for a 2525MHz sweet spot, so for example, if I set 2625MHz (2560MHz effective), it would be pointless because it's running above the LD4? In that case, what voltage would I need for 2585MHz, or should I just keep it at 2573? Sometimes in the game, I can see it hitting 2540MHz for a split second with the setting you provided. I personally am going to keep it that way if there's no other optimization to boost clocks further.GerryB schrieb:don´t change LD5
With Fmax 2573, wouldn't it only hit 2513 as the effective clock? Wouldn't 2585 be the optimal Fmax to hit 2525, or am I misunderstanding what the LD4 optimization does?GerryB schrieb:with maxClock 2573 may be useful to change LD4 2500-->2525MHz as described #6.645)
GerryB
Commodore
- Registriert
- Sep. 2016
- Beiträge
- 4.451
the old optimization@2,525Ghz should be fine till around eff. 2525MHz and some MHz abovecra3khead schrieb:With Fmax 2573, wouldn't it only hit 2513 as the effective clock? Wouldn't 2585 be the optimal Fmax to hit 2525, or am I misunderstanding what the LD4 optimization does?
but you ask also, what is with higher eff.MHz.(x)
btw.
There was an 10-error in post#6.658.(see edit)
(x) it is only tought to define more exact the Volt around this clock